All Topics
Infrastructure

Broadband Infrastructure

Rural areas remain disinvested and under-connected due to coordination, terrain, and cost barriers. Modoc County has the highest percentage of unserved population (69% at 25/3 speed) and households without internet (20.7%). Broadband limitations compound healthcare, education, and economic challenges.

20.7%
Modoc Households Without Internet
North State 2024(2024)
16.3%
Tehama Households Without Internet
North State 2024(2024)
15.4%
Plumas Households Without Internet
North State 2024(2024)
15.4%
Siskiyou Households Without Internet
North State 2024(2024)

Trinity County Perspective

Regional broadband data from the North State CEDS paints a stark picture for rural counties, though Trinity County is notably absent from the specific metrics reported. The counties most comparable to Trinity in population density and terrain — Modoc, Siskiyou, and Lassen — show 15–21% of households without internet and 26–69% of residents unserved at basic 25/3 Mbps speeds. Given Trinity's extreme mountainous terrain, sparse population, and lack of a significant urban center, its actual connectivity gaps likely fall in this same range or worse. At the higher 100/20 Mbps tier increasingly required for telehealth, remote work, and education, peer counties show 44–100% unserved — a threshold that effectively locks rural residents out of the digital economy.

The path forward runs through two active regional efforts: the Middle-Mile backbone project and CASF/NTIA-funded last-mile builds, both coordinated through the Upstate California Connect Consortia. For a county of 15,600 people where ISP revenue models don't pencil out, municipal-owned network development deserves serious board-level attention. The immediate priority is ensuring Trinity County is represented in regional broadband mapping and funding applications — counties without data don't get dollars. Workforce training to support deployment is a secondary opportunity that could put local workers on broadband construction crews already heading into the region.

High Priority Actions

2
Develop broadband workforce training programshigh

Support deployment for Middle-Mile project, CASF- and NTIA-funded projects, and private/municipal networks

Continue funding application and mapping supporthigh

Through Northeastern and Upstate California Connect Consortia

Challenges

8
  • Lack of coordination between jurisdictions since projects cross county lines
  • Terrain barriers to building infrastructure
  • Natural disasters destroying existing infrastructure
  • Sparse population density makes revenue generation difficult for ISPs
  • High-cost plans inaccessible to much of the population
  • Limited ISP choices in North State
  • Broadband limitations compound telehealth, education, and remote work challenges
  • Some residents must drive to find cell service

Opportunities

5
  • Middle-Mile project deployment
  • CASF and NTIA funded projects
  • Municipal-owned network development
  • Digital literacy training programs
  • Remote work attraction enabled by broadband

All Recommendations

1
Build equity access and digital literacy programsmedium

Focus on English-Language Learners, Justice-Involved Re-entry Employees, and other barriered populations

Supporting Data

19

All data points traced to source documents. Click a source badge to view the original report.

14.0%
Glenn Households Without Internet
Mid-range in region
13.7%
Lassen Households Without Internet
Mid-range in region
11.1%
Shasta Households Without Internet
Lower due to urban center (Redding)
10.1%
Butte Households Without Internet
Lowest in region due to Chico
69%
Modoc Unserved at 25/3
Highest unserved population for basic broadband
100%
Modoc Unserved at 100/20
Entire population unserved at higher speed tier
29%
Lassen Unserved at 25/3
Second highest unserved for basic broadband
44%
Lassen Unserved at 100/20
Second lowest unserved at higher tier
26%
Siskiyou Unserved at 25/3
Third highest unserved
86%
Siskiyou Unserved at 100/20
Second highest at higher speed tier
50%
Tehama Unserved at 100/20
Half the population unserved at higher tier
63%
Plumas Unserved at 100/20
Majority unserved at higher tier
35%
Glenn Unserved at 100/20
Over one-third unserved at higher tier
25%
Shasta Unserved at 100/20
Quarter unserved at higher tier
15%
Butte Unserved at 100/20
Lowest unserved at higher tier
How to Read This Data
Source (2024)Recent data (1-2 years). Click to view source document.
Source (2022)Older data (2-3 years). May need updating.
Source (2020)Dated (4+ years). Verify before citing.
All data extracted from official county reports using AI. Source badges link to original PDFs.
Organizations (4)
Northeastern California Connect ConsortiumUpstate California Connect ConsortiumCASFNTIA
At a Glance
Data Points19
Action Items3
High Priority2
Organizations4